Archive for the ‘engineering’ Category

Using the Solar Path Finder

Tuesday, August 9th, 2011

Taking the guess work out of your site visits is paramount when selecting a location for a solar installation. One of the best tools out there is the Solar Pathfinder.

Metro Solar Atlanta uses the Solar Pathfinder before all of our solar hot water installations.The Solar Pathfinder operates on a very simple premise. It uses a reflective dome to give a panoramic view of the entire site.

The installer sets up the Solar Pathfinder in the proposed location where the solar collectors will be located, typically on the roof. Declination is accounted for prior to the setup.

 

A small compass on the pathfinder is used to make sure that the unit is oriented to due south.

Once in position the unit is leveled using a bubble level built into the unit.

 

Once the unit is in place a digital photograph is taken of the dome. The dome reflects all of the obstructions at the site onto a sunpath diagram.

 The sunpath diagrams are latitude specific and allow you to convert the view on the dome into useful information. The outline of the trees reflected onto the dome reveals where the shading will occur at a specific point in time on the diagram. Deciduous trees that will lose their leaves in the fall or grow them in the spring can also be taken into account. A pen is used to trace the outline of the trees onto the paper diagram, or you can import the digital photo into a computer and use a drawing program to trace the outline.

 

Here the sunpath diagram is shown without the dome. The diagram represents the path of the sun at different times and during different months.

If you are an  installer  a Solar Path Finder is definitely worth the money at around $200.  If you are a potential solar consumer insist your installer use a Solar Path Finder or other similar device before  any solar installation, whether it’s PV or solar thermal.  They can also be used for landscaping and other similar functions.

How solar simulation software can maximize your projects

Monday, July 18th, 2011

 

 

Simulation software can be used to maximize the efficiency your solar installations before you ever set foot on the roof.

Let’s take a roof orientation of east-southeast or 120°. Let’s say the roof is a typical 5/12 pitch or about 22 degrees. Since the orientation is 60 degrees out from due south we want to model the site to determine the best mounting configuration to maximize our solar exposure.

We ran a simulation on the site using a flat mount orientation to use as our baseline. This configuration returned a 71% solar fraction.

Rotating the collector on its side in a “landscape” orientation would orient the collector to 210°.

(120 + 90 = 210)

This angle goes beyond due south but we can infer that we would have an increased solar fraction verses the flat mount configuration since it is closer to 180°.

Resetting the simulation orientation to 210° and selecting 30° as the tilt angle resulted in a 76.2% solar fraction, or over a 5% increase. A tilt mount rack does not increase the installation cost much so this would be a practical upgrade.

The “book” says that to maximize solar gain during winter to add 15° to the site’s latitude.

(In our case 33° + 15° = 48°)

Running a simulation for every angle between 48 and 30 reveals that the optimal tilt angle for our given orientation of 210° is 35°. This configuration gives us a solar fraction of 76.6% per year. This results in nearly 6% increase in solar fraction per year which means more money saved.

Here at Metro Solar Atlanta we utilize Polysun’s premier simulation software before every solar hot water installation. Many others are available. Simulation software will save valuable time and maximize your installation’s efficiency. Maximizing efficiency is what solar is all about.

 

 

Sizing Solar Loops

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011


 

Accounting for friction loss in solar loop piping is important to properly size a solar hot water system.  Here at Metro Solar Atlanta we use this engineering principle to correctly size solar hot water systems.

With copper each increase in size also increases the cost. Not only does the piping itself cost more but the insulation costs more as well. So for that reason it makes sense to keep the piping down to the smallest diameter possible and still have enough flow to meet the demand of the system.

Let’s set up a hypothetical solar hot water installation.

Let’s say that the length of the run from the tank to the collector is about 60 feet one way. So that makes the entire loop roughly 120 feet plus the length of the piping through the collector and the heat exchanger. We won’t go into the friction loss of the collector or heat exchanger today, just the piping in the loop since it is usually the major contributor. (residential systems)

In order to figure out the amount of pressure drop due to friction in any pipe you can use the Hazen-Williams equation. The Hazen Williams equation is: Pd = 4.52 x Q^1.85 / (C^1.85 x d^4.865)

where:

Pd = pressure drop

Q = flow in gallons per minute

d = average inside diameter

C = roughness constant (140 for copper)

Let’s start out by sizing for 1/2” pipe. The diameter of Type L 1/2”copper tubing is .545”.

Let’s use a hypothetical flow rate of 3 gpm.

Pd = 4.52 x 3^1.85/(140^1.85 x .545^4.865)

Pd = 8.45psi

This does not include any fittings the collector or the heat exchanger.

This much pressure loss is unacceptable. Friction loss should be kept as low as possible but should not ever exceed 5psi.

So let’s look at the same system using 3/4” piping to see if we can get this number down to a manageable size.

The diameter of Type L 3/4”copper tubing is .785.

Pd = 4.52 x 3^1.85/(140^1.85 x .785^4.865)

Pd = 1.4psi

So the pressure loss is 1.4psi. This number is a lot more manageable. We can live with this even if the fittings, collector and heat exchanger double this number we are still below 4 psi which is below our 5 psi rule of thumb.

Pump curves are labeled by “feet of head” or some other similar title. Pump curves show the relationship between the amount of head the pump can provide at a given flow rate. So we need to convert our pressure loss into feet of head. To do this we multiply the psi by 2.31.

In our example, we would multiply 1.4psi by 2.31 which gives us 3.23 feet of head. After adding in our losses due to fittings, collector and heat exchanger we can use the pump curve to select the proper size pump for our system. This gives us the ability to select a pump that meets our demand and uses the smallest amount of electricity to perform it’s duty.

There are many free online resources that will calculate friction loss for you.

Engineers Toolbox has many online tools.